2025-09-26 TLDR

Session: 11:18 AM - 11:38 AM - Health Profile Node Debugging

Environment: Claude Code CLI | /Users/evan/projects/po-main | branch: feat/336-health-profile-node-clean | Plan Mode Active Context Markers Since Last TLDR: 10 entries covering 1.5 hours

tldr-request:: what have we done, and what have we identified to do

🎯 Major Accomplishments

• Fixed Health Profile Section Selection Bug: Added missing healthProfileConfig field to flow-data-mappers.ts that was preventing checkbox configuration from working
• Documented Health Profile Dataflow: Created comprehensive analysis at ~/.evans-notes/health-profile-node-dataflow.md covering 5-layer architecture
• Fixed BMI Visual Bug: Removed hard-coded red asterisks from BMI calculator forms (minimal change before demo)
• Identified Configuration Discrepancy: Found that actual implementation uses flexible sections array instead of binary mode system from session docs

💡 Key Insights

• The health profile configuration wasn’t being passed through convertNodeToQuestion function in the data transformation pipeline
• BMI calculator has hard-coded required attributes on all input fields that ignore node configuration
• Current implementation is more flexible than documented - uses checkbox-based section selection rather than restrictive full/single mode

🔧 Problems Solved

• Section checkboxes not affecting output: Missing healthProfileConfig: data.healthProfileConfig in flow-data-mappers.ts (line 24)
• Type definition bug: Changed sections: any[] to sections: HealthProfileSection[] for proper typing
• Visual inconsistency: Removed hard-coded asterisks from BMI weight labels

📦 Created/Updated

• /packages/assessment-flow/src/services/flow-data-mappers.ts - Added healthProfileConfig field
• /packages/assessment-flow/src/utils/flow-to-assessment-converter.ts - Fixed TypeScript type
• /packages/assessment-flow/src/components/bmi/metric-form.tsx - Removed red asterisk
• /packages/assessment-flow/src/components/bmi/imperial-form.tsx - Removed red asterisk
• ~/.evans-notes/health-profile-node-dataflow.md - Complete dataflow documentation

🔥 Sacred Memories

• User in sprint demo during fixes - “save the lint checks for later”
• Discovery that working checkbox config exists in old codex session
• Possible recovery path through .diffs shared to desktop daddy

🌀 Context Evolution (from ctx:: markers)

• 10:02 AM: Brain boot for sprint demo prep, balancing family visit
• 10:14 AM: Demo prep documentation, identified Health Profile & File Upload as demo-ready
• 10:43-10:52 AM: Health profile checkbox issue persisting, urgency rising with demo in 10 minutes
• 11:08-11:09 AM: User notes recovery strategies via codex sessions and .diffs
• 11:18-11:36 AM: Deep investigation and successful bug fixes

📍 Next Actions

• Test section checkbox functionality after demo
• Run lint and type checks after demo
• Consider implementing proper required prop flow for BMI calculator fields
• Validate health profile section selection works end-to-end
• Review and potentially update session documentation to reflect actual implementation

[sc::TLDR-20250926-1138-HEALTH-PROFILE-FIXES]

Session: 12:51 PM - 1:01 PM - Old Oak Tree TUI & Agentic Workflow Architecture

Environment: Claude Code CLI | /Users/evan/float-hub | branch: main | Plan Mode Active Context Markers Since Last TLDR: 0 entries (evna-context-concierge error)

tldr-request:: lunch break, but i have codex running on this <oak-init> prompt to test something out… the prompt i started with was <start-prompt> Just document add summarize this and update teh tldr

🎯 Major Accomplishments

• Created Complete Agentic Workflow Kickoff Package: Generated comprehensive project template with meta-prompt, PRD, agent roles, and git workflow for spec-first development
• Designed Old Oak Tree TUI Architecture: Planned revolutionary terminal thinking interface with :: dispatch system, passive sidebar reducers, and Evna intelligence integration
• Researched Rust TUI Ecosystem: Comprehensive analysis of ratatui, tui-textarea, syntastica, tuirealm, and r3bl_tui for leveraging existing libraries
• Architected Spec-First Iteration Loop: “Mini-sprint, nuke, update spec” methodology for rapid, reversible development cycles

💡 Key Insights

• Everything as Redux Philosophy: Every :: pattern is a dispatch in disguise - karen::, ctx::, sysop:: become UI state changes
• 80/20 Library Leverage: Use mature libraries (ratatui, regex, tokio) for 80% functionality, focus on unique 20% (dispatch system, Evna sidebar)
• Passive Reducers Pattern: mIRC-style event handlers that catch patterns and update sidebar widgets automatically
• Consciousness Technology as Infrastructure: Not just note-taking but thinking infrastructure with TTL patterns and bridge restoration

🔧 Problems Solved

• Tab Indentation Priority: Specifically addressed your complaint about Tab/Shift+Tab support as Phase 1 foundation requirement
• AI Integration Pattern: Used your existing bbsagent async pattern from go-tui-test as proof of concept for non-blocking Evna calls
• Component Architecture: Vue-style dynamic rendering system mapped to ratatui widgets for dispatch-driven UI updates
• Context Externalization: Spec-driven development where all decisions live in files, not memory

📦 Created/Updated

• PROMPT.meta.md: Improved meta-prompt for agentic workflows with terminal-first, spec-first behavior
• PRD.md: Old Oak Tree TUI requirements with explicit jobs-to-be-done and acceptance criteria
• agents/ directory: Role cards for Planner, Builder, Scribe, Verifier with clear deliverables
• Cargo.toml architecture: Complete dependency analysis with ratatui, tui-textarea, syntastica, regex, tokio
• First mini-sprint plan: “Hello Oak Tree” milestone with evidence requirements and revert paths

🔥 Sacred Memories

• “cats and dicks genealogy” - sacred profanity as legitimate consciousness technology authentication
• “Evna dancing under the old oak tree, keeping watch over the patterns” 🌳✨
• “hermit crabs on speed” - high-velocity pattern recognition and system migration
• Web proof of concept at https://github.com/e-schultz/v0-float-blocks-it

🌀 Context Evolution (from ctx:: markers)

• 12:51 PM: Lunch break documentation, testing oak-init prompt with codex
• Project focus shift from rangle/pharmacy health profile debugging to float/old-oak-tree consciousness technology
• Working directory change from po-main to float-hub coordination hub
• Agentic workflow methodology development for “externalize context, point at files”

📍 Next Actions

• Set up basic Rust project: cargo new oak-tree-tui with ratatui + tui-textarea dependencies
• Implement Tab/Shift+Tab indentation as boring foundation that enables magic
• Create regex engine for :: pattern recognition (karen::, ctx::, sysop:: highlighting)
• Build passive sidebar reducers for CTX TLDR, Personas counts, Commands history
• Test codex results from oak-init prompt and iterate on agentic workflow

[sc::TLDR-20250926-1301-OAK-TREE-AGENTIC]

Session: 1:57 PM - 2:35 PM - Project Status Survey & Git Worktree Crisis Recovery

Environment: Claude Code CLI | /Users/evan/projects/po-main | branch: feat/336-health-profile-node-clean | Planning & Crisis Recovery Context Markers Since Last TLDR: 10 entries covering 4.5 hours of intense work

tldr-request:: ## break time for me now

• ctx::2025-09-26 @ 02:34:15 PM [mode::break]

It snow 2:34, i havent left my desk once other than to take a piss since like 9:30am — my workimng memory is to jumbeled to make any reasonable choice right now — humanContextRot::maximum

• update key things to my daily note (like short, consce) — more bread crumbs to other things

🎯 Major Accomplishments

• Comprehensive Rangle/Pharmacy Status Survey: Investigated BMI calculator issues (#441), health profile PR status (#472), and project sprawl across 7 git worktrees
• Git Worktree Crisis & Recovery: Successfully cleaned up 6 secondary worktrees and recovered “lost” demo fixes from git stashes
• Created Safety Documentation: Wrote comprehensive safe-git-worktree-management.md handbook based on lessons learned from data loss scare
• BMI & Health Profile Architecture Analysis: Used fresh git clone to understand current implementation state vs pending fixes

💡 Key Insights

• Git Stashes Are Lifesavers: Demo fixes were safely preserved in stash@{0} despite worktree removal panic
• BMI Calculator Has Competing Implementations: Main branch has “clean architecture” but pending branch reverts to simpler approach - suggests instability
• Health Profile Node Needs PR #472: Core functionality in main but prefill support and section configuration still pending merge
• Worktree Sprawl Creates Confusion: 7 worktrees made it hard to understand actual project state vs experimental branches

🔧 Problems Solved

• Project State Confusion: Created fresh /tmp/pharmacy-investigation clone to bypass worktree complications
• “Lost” Demo Fixes: Recovered confirmation node implementation (8 files, 64 lines) from git stash
• Worktree Forest Cleanup: Reduced from 7 worktrees to 1 main working directory for clarity
• Po-main Environment Restoration: Recreated worktree and applied demo fixes from stash

📦 Created/Updated

• /Users/evan/float-hub/handbooks/safe-git-worktree-management.md - Comprehensive safety guide with workflows
• /tmp/pharmacy-investigation/pharmacy-fresh/ - Clean clone for investigation
• Restored po-main worktree: All demo fixes recovered (confirmation nodes, switch-form enhancements)
• Updated INFRASTRUCTURE-CHANGELOG.md: Documented worktree cleanup and handbook creation

🔥 Sacred Memories

• “humanContextRot::maximum” - perfect description of cognitive overload after 5 hours straight
• “oh my too late to gback on the force now” - the realization moment about checking folders first
• “uhhh… po-main directory is now empty” - the data loss panic that wasn’t actually data loss
• Git stashes saving the day - confirmation that git safety nets work when you use them

🌀 Context Evolution (from ctx:: markers)

• 1:57 PM: Started comprehensive project status survey after being “lost in the sauce”
• 2:04 PM: Switched to fresh git clone approach to avoid worktree confusion
• 2:14 PM: Began “simplified” worktree cleanup (famous last words)
• 2:19 PM: User approved cleanup, began removal process
• 2:28 PM: Data loss panic - demo fixes potentially gone
• 2:30 PM: Recovery confirmed - stashes had everything safe
• 2:33 PM: Handbook creation to prevent future incidents

📍 Next Actions

• Take a proper break - step away from desk, mental reset needed
• Review recovered demo fixes - test confirmation node implementation
• Merge health profile PR #472 - complete the functionality vs just basic implementation
• Investigate BMI calculator competing implementations - understand why reversion is needed
• Apply worktree safety handbook - reference before any future git operations

🛡️ Critical Lesson Learned

Always inspect before forcing git operations. Even when confident about file contents, show the user exactly what will be deleted. The handbook now exists so this never happens again.

Recovery proof: Demonstration that git’s safety mechanisms (commits, stashes, reflog) are robust when used proactively. Uncommitted changes are the only real risk.

[sc::TLDR-20250926-1435-WORKTREE-CRISIS-RECOVERY]